Australia - how are they doing?

publication date: Feb 15, 2003
Download Print Send a summary of this page to someone via email.
Previous | Next
 

If Australian wine producers had egos (which I rather doubt) they must surely find it much more comfortable to visit the United States, where they are generally regarded as heroes, than Britain.

The British fell so resoundingly in love with Australian wine in the early 1990s that there is now the inevitable backlash from them, accusing Australians of making boring wines to a formula for faceless corporations. The problem of course is that the British wine buyer is, typically, a penny-pincher in a supermarket. It is not surprising therefore that most of the Australian wines seen on this side of Atlantic are heavily discounted big company offerings.

American wine consumers may not represent such a high proportion of the population but they are open-fisted - indeed, unlike their British counterparts who view wines over £10 a bottle with deep suspicion, they tend to believe that there is a direct correlation between price and quality (another proposition which I personally doubt).

The result is that the average price paid by Americans for a litre of Australian wine last year was US $4.65 at the cellar door, almost half as much again as the British paid. And many of Australia's most interesting, generally smaller, wine producers are focusing all their export attention on the US market rather than the budget-conscious British one (which is still much larger than the US, but the US is catching up fast).


Fish in wine, executives in a pickle, vines hardly in the ground but Americans in clover. Here is a round-up of some of the more interesting recent developments in Australian wine.

As Michael Hill Smith concluded a speech on Australian wine's quality and diversity in London last week, 'we're on the cusp of the next leap forward in terms of quality and variety'.

See my tasting notes on purple pages for some favourite old-vine Australians.



 
Previous | Next